That don't add up man!

The official version of the September 11, 2001 was gospel for a while. In the heat of the event, any questions about 'who dunnit?' were taboo, unpatriotic and 'terrorist' inspired!

However with the dust settling, the disturbing inconsistencies have raised some serious questions. Conspiracy theories aside, the official US version simply doesn't add up:

:eek:

That a passport was found intact in Lower Manhattan 'belonging to one of the hijackers' which 'proves' that he was on board and responsible for the hijacking.

A. No piece of whatever could have survived and escaped the inferno of the blast and been thrown out of the plane conveniently into Lower Manhattan!

B. Even if such a wierdity could occur, it proves nothing about the 'fact' that such a person was responsible for the hijacking, just because his name is Arabic.

C. Not very likely that anyone would carry a passport on a domestic flight.

:eek:

That there is absolutely no footage available of the supposed plane that crashed into the Pentagon, while so many clips of the crash into the WTC are so generously available. Granted that the cameras were out after the first crash into the first tower, but amateur footage of the first crash was available as well. In the peak hour traffic of the Washington DC, parked bumper to bumper, none of the supposed eye witnesses carried a video camera in the capital of the first world country!

No tourist equipped with a video camera would have missed an opportunity to film an aircraft descending into the middle of the city! Inspite of the fact that Washington DC is full of tourists with video and still cameras, no footage of the supposed plane was ever recorded! Just imagine the Japanese tourist letting go such an event unphotographed!

:eek:

That there are absolutely no marks of the impact of the wings on the facade of the Pentagon where the supposed plane made its entry into the complex.

:eek:

That the supposed plane choose to crash into the most recently refurbished part which had hardly any people in it.

:eek:

That absolutely no parts of the plane were found as the debris, not even the tail or the smashed engine or whatever.

:eek:

That the anthrax attacks should have been inititiated on the same day as the hijackings. That the two are supposedly orchestrated by two different groups who choose to act independently so coincidentally on the same day!

:eek:

And that Osama Bin Laden so conveniently disappears off the scene after the American agenda in Afghanistan is complete. No more attacks, no more video threats, no second strike, no drama, no kidding!

Think about it folks. Value your own judgement. Who wants to be a be gullible consumer of mass produced media hype and state productions. Hollywood fictional fantasies have more entertainment value and credibility than that.

Re: That don't add up man!

Thought this post deserved its own thread eh?

Quote:

Originally posted by The Strategist

That a passport was found intact in Lower Manhattan 'belonging to one of the hijackers' which 'proves' that he was on board and responsible for the hijacking.

A. No piece of whatever could have survived and escaped the inferno of the blast and been thrown out of the plane conveniently into Lower Manhattan!

B. Even if such a wierdity could occur, it proves nothing about the 'fact' that such a person was responsible for the hijacking, just because his name is Arabic.

C. Not very likely that anyone would carry a passport on a domestic flight.

i'll let someone else field this one as i've never heard this account from what i would call a reliable source. does sound funny tho, and i guess thats why i doubt its credibility as a claim.

Quote:

That there is absolutely no footage available of the supposed plane that crashed into the Pentagon, while so many clips of the crash into the WTC are so generously available. Granted that the cameras were out after the first crash into the first tower, but I have seen amatuer footage of the first crash as well.

actually there is pentagon security footage of the incoming plane. digital video so not many frames per second, only a frame or two had the plane in it.

Quote:

That there are absolutely no marks of the impact of the wings on the facade of the Pentagon where the supposed plane made its entry into the complex.

LOL did ya expect the kind of evidence as in wily e coyote running thru a door? LOL

Quote:

That the supposed plane choose to crash into the most recently refurbished part which had hardly any people in it.

whew that was close!

Quote:

That absolutely no parts of the plane were found as the debris, not even the tail or the smashed engine or whatever.

let see ... jumbo jet coming to a stop from ohhh say 300-400 mph in a mater of 10-15 feet. what source says 'absolutely no parts'?

Quote:

That the anthrax attacks should have been inititiated on the same day as the hijackings. That the two are supposedly orchestrated by two different groups who choose to act independently so coincidentally on the same day!

The official line is that these incidents are unrelated but i suspect it was never claimed to be linked because of lack of evidence and as you know if there was a lack of evidence in one case, noone would have believed the evidence in the other case.

Quote:

And that Osama Bin Laden so conveniently disappears off the scene after the American agenda in Afghanistan is complete. No more attacks, no more video threats, no second strike, no drama, no kidding!

running like a scared little girl from the taliban man, some hero eh? of course other strikes appear to have been averted, some top al queda guys are kissin arse in gitamo, and desperate hangerons are trying to claim hes still alive, but just cant come to the phone at the moment ... hehehe

Quote:

Think about it folks. Value your own judgement. Don't be gullible consumers of mass produced media hype and state productions.

damn good advice! take it

ARE AMERICANS THE VICTIMS OF A HOAX?

The time has come to stop using the flag as a blindfold, to stop waving our guns and our gods at each other, to take a close look at the facts which have emerged from the attacks on the World Trade Towers and to recognize the very real possibility, indeed probability, that We The People are the victims of a gigantic and deadly hoax.
In a normal terrorist event, the terrorists cannot wait to take credit, in order to link the violence to the socio-political intent of the terrorist organization. Yet the prime suspect in the New York Towers case, ex(?) CIA asset Osama Bin Laden (whose brother is one of George W. Bush's Texas business partners), has issued only two statements regarding the September 11th attacks, and both of those are denials of any involvement.

Huge problems are emerging in the official view of events. It's known that the United States was planning an invasion of Afghanistan long before the attacks on the World Trade Towers. Indeed the attacks on the World Trade Towers perfectly fit the timetable of an invasion by October stated by US officials just last summer.

The 19 names of suspected hijackers released by the FBI don't point to Afghanistan. They come from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates; all across the middle east without a focus in any one region. Indeed, even as the FBI was admitting that its list of 19 names was based solely on identifications thought to have been forged, Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saudi Al-Faisal insisted that an investigation in Saudi Arabia showed that the 5 Saudi men were not aboard the four jet liners that crashed in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania on September 11. "It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list had nothing to do with what happened," Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press in Washington after meeting with U.S. President George W. Bush at the White House. A sixth identified hijacker is also reported to still be alive in Tunisia, while a 7th named man died two years ago!

The 19 names of suspected hijackers released by the FBI don't even appear on the passenger lists of the hijacked planes.

The FBI list of alleged hijackers

Passengers of American Airlines Flight 11

Passengers of American Airlines Flight 77

Passengers of United Airlines Flight 93

Passengers of United Airlines Flight 175

CNN reported that the men who hijacked those aircraft were using phony IDs, using the names of real people still living in Arab nations in the middle east.

In another development, the BBC is reporting that the transcript of a phone call made by Flight Attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney to Boston air traffic controls shows that the flight attendant gave the seat numbers occupied by the hijackers, seat numbers which were NOT the seats of the men the FBI claimed were responsible for the hijacking!

FBI Chief Robert Mueller admitted on September 20 and on September 27 that at this time the FBI has no legal proof to prove the true identities of the suicidal hijackers. Yet in the haste to move forward on the already planned war in Afghanistan, our government and the FBI (which does not have the best record for honesty in investigations to begin with, having been caught rigging lab tests, manufacturing testimony in the Vincent Foster affair, and illegally withholding/destroying evidence in the Oklahoma Bombing case) are not taking too close a look at evidence that points away from the designated suspect, ex(?) CIA asset Osama Bin Laden.

In particular, the FBI, too busy harassing political dissenters to find spies in its midst, the long rumored mole inside the White House, or plug leaks in high-tech flowing to foreign nations, has willfully and criminally ignored the implications of some vital pieces of information the FBI is itself waving around at the public.

We are being told that this crack team of terrorists, able to breeze past airport security as if it wasn't there, wound up leaving so much evidence in its wake that the bumbling Inspector Clouseau (or the FBI) could not fail to stumble over it. The locations where the terrorists supposedly stayed are so overloaded with damning materials that they resemble less a crimes scene, and more a "B" detective movie set, with vital clues always on prominent display for the cameras.

Yet another problem lies with the described actions of the hijackers themselves. We are being told on the one hand that these men were such fanatical devotees of their faith that they willingly crashed the jets they were flying into buildings. Yet on the other hand, we are being told that these same men spent the night before their planned visit to Allah drinking in strip bars, committing not just one, but two mortal sins which would keep them out of Paradise no matter what else they did. Truly devout Muslims would spend the day before a suicide attack fasting and praying. Not only does the drinking in strip bars not fit the profile of a fanatically religious Muslim willing to die for his cause, but the witness reports of the men in the bars are of men going out of their way to be noticed and remembered, while waving around phony identifications.

Because of the facts of the phony identifications, we don't really know who was on those planes. What we do know is that the men on those planes went to a great deal of trouble to steal the identities of Muslims, and to make sure those identities were seen and remembered, then to leave a plethora of planted clues around, such as crop dusting manuals, and letters in checked baggage (why does a terrorist about to die need to check baggage?) that "somehow" didn't get on the final, fatal, flight.

Fake terror is nothing new. According to recently released files, our government planned Operation NORTHWOODS to stage phony terror attacks against American citizens in the wake of the Bay Of Pigs, to anger Americans into support for a second invasion of Cuba. The plan was spiked by JFK. If our government has ever actually carried out such plans to stage phony terror attacks, the documents have remained classified. But given the reality of Operation NORTHWOODS, or the manner in which FDR maneuvered Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor, one cannot rule out the possibility that, once again, the people of the United States are being lied to by their own government, to manufacture consent for a war of invasion already being discussed with other nations the previous summer.

It is also quite possible, indeed likely, that the United States is being spoofed by a third party to trigger a war. It has happened before. According to Victor Ostrovsky, a defector from Israel's secret service, Mossad, Israel decided to mount a false flag operation designed to further discredit Libya, and provoke the US to attack an Arab nation. A transmitter loaded with pre-recorded messages was planted in Tripoli, Libya, by a Mossad team.

The `Trojan Horse' beamed out fake messages about Libyan-authorized bombings and planned attacks that were immediately intercepted by US electronic monitoring. Convinced by this disinformation that Libya was behind the 1986 bombing of a Berlin disco in which a US soldier died, President Ronald Reagan ordered massive air attacks on Libya, including an obvious- and illegal (under US law) attempt to assassinate Qadaffi himself. Some 100 Libyan civilians were killed, including Qadaffi's two year old daughter. Libyan officials had no idea why they were attacked.

It is worth remembering the motto of the Mossad is, "By way of deception, thou shalt do war."

Whether they were involved in the attacks or not, it cannot be doubted that Israel has benefited from the attacks in New York. While world attention is focused on what the US will do in Afghanistan, Israel has escalated its attacks against Palestinians towns. Israel has repeatedly tried to claim that Palestinians were involved in the New York attacks, hoping to bury the Palestinian cause under the rubble of the World Trade Towers.

Because of the faked IDs and stolen identities, we don't really know who planned the World Trade Towers attacks. We only know who they wanted us to blame.

And we know that the United States has been tricked in the past into bombing someone who did not deserve the attack, and that those who were bombed then embarked on what from their point of view was justified retaliation that culminated over Lockerbie. And while bombs were falling and planes were crashing, Israel was laughing at us that we had been so easily fooled into bombing Israel's targets for them.

Are we being hoaxed again, by Israel, or by our own government, or by both? It's impossible to rule that out. Right now there are a lot of people who want war. Oil companies want Afghanistan's petroleum products. Our corporations want "friendlier" markets. The CIA wants all that opium. And all those war-mongers, with all their greed and agendas, will not hesitate in the least to pour your tax dollars and your children's blood all over Afghanistan, to get those "friendlier" markets, oil, and opium.

Because of the vested interests at work here, American citizens must, more than at any other time in recent history, rely on themselves to decide what is happening in our nation. Too many of those who purport to report the "truth" to us are eager to grab more tax money and more children to pour into a war of invasion, poised at a region which has swallowed up every army that has tried to conquer it since the time of Alexander The Great.

And one more thing. Take a good look at the map of Eurasia and plot out where the United States has military deployments. They march in a straight line through the middle of Eurasia, Macedonia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenia, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan.

The United States is prepared to cut the Russian Federation off from the oil rich middle east, and to control transportation routes from China and India into the Middle East. When Russia realizes that this is the real agenda, that's when "Dubya Dubya Three" will really get going!

POSTSCRIPT: Looks like the cat is out of the bag. See http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/10/08/17401.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Logo of the Mossad.

Top: "kee betachbulot ta'ase lecha milchama"
Translation: "By way of deception thou shalt do war"

Bottom: "Ha'Mossad Le'modiein"
Translation: "The institute for the collection of Information"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guess what guys, when a plane is lightly loaded, the attendants let you sit WHEREVER YOU WANT.

It is too easy for you guys to overlook the physical evidence, the paper trails, money trails, eye witnesses co-oberatting stories on flight training, fake id's, etc... The MUSLIM/ISLAMIC suicide handbooks carted around by guys like Atta and Mousouiii.

Face the facts and get over it.

You can't reap the moral high's of 'doing it for Palestine', then claim the Moussad was responsible for it all.

If Bin Laden denied being Suadi, you guys would eat it up.

This is the LAST AND FINAL WORD from me on 9/11 conspiracy. If evidence proves conspiracy us nay sayers will eat our words.

Bush knew about the attack before hand

QUESTION: One thing, Mr. President, is that you have no idea how much you've done for this country, and another thing is that how did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack?

BUSH: Well...

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you, Jordan (ph).

Well, Jordan (ph), you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident."

But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/04/se.04.html

according to this, bush was watching it live!! footage of the first plane crashing only emerged a few days later.

He was not watching live footage!!
Haven't you heard of TAPE DELAY!!
Geez how desperate can you people be!!
You'll believe anything but the truth.

Quote:

Originally posted by USMC
He was not watching live footage!!
Haven't you heard of TAPE DELAY!!
Geez how desperate can you people be!!
You'll believe anything but the truth.

I think the actual plan it to try and make everybody else believe anything but the truth.

Propaganda for the cause.

Point well taken Snshine!!

Brother Strat, nothing at all adds up about that 'event' and every Muslim (plus a few Christians) know it!
However, those daft buggers know things are amiss (cos' they caused them) but they're concealing the truth. It'll come out one day but it'll be too late by then. It's nothing new. They've made up lies and concocted and manipulated events from the Spanish-Amrikkan War onwards to Pearl Harbour, from the Gulf of Tonkin incident to the bombing of Libya and '11 September'. And not forgetting the lies and cover-ups about Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald, Marilyn Monroe, Martin Luther King...
Who to this day knows what really goes on in the self-appointed so-called 'world's greatest democracy'?

It's just all Jahoodi lies, evil and cunning. Nobody ever asks why 5 Yisraelis were found celebrating and high fivin' near the WTC after it was demolished.

And hundreds of other things don't add up like the so-called 'suicide letters' of the so-called 'hijackers' who wrote things that are completely out of character for any Muslim who was about to die.

For example, the lies about 'Mohammad Atta' requesting that no one should touch his private parts when bathing his body. Firstly, as you know Muslims don't touch a dead Muslim's private parts when bathing him, so there's no need to even say this (and the person has to be covered with a cloth that hides his modesty). Secondly, if a Muslim or indeed any other person was going to crash a plane into a building, would he be expecting his body to survive intact so that it could be ritually bathed later on? If a person allegedly knows so much technical stuff like piloting a plane, aviator fuel and it effects etc., would he not think that his own body would be blown to smithereens when he crashed his plane into a large building? Damned right he would! It's all cr@p and fabrication.

They've then used that event to attack the Muslim world from all sides, to remove the Taliban, to (try to) kill brother Osama, to steal more Muslim oil (in Central Asia), to bring about ‘Eretz’ or ‘Greater’ Israel by facilitating more Yid expansionism, to wipe Palestinians off the face of the earth, to obliterate Iraq and its people out of existence, to eliminate Muslim freedom movements in Palestine, Kashmir, Chechnya, Basilan and elsewhere and to completely dominate countries like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan etc…

A few sane Americans have questioned the inconsistencies and contradictions but most believe the Jewish lies and media, choosing not to question anything.

Bilquis,

Keep dreaming Alice, you'll wake up in wonderland someday!

Just a couple of points from a naive observer:

1. Two friends or mine were in New York that day and actually saw the second impact - one of them is an antiwar/antiglobalisation activist and a member of greenpeace and so unlikely to lie for the cia.

2. It is very likely artifacts like a passport will survive an explosion like this. The explosion will tend to rip large objects to pieces, but very quickly disperse them outside the fireball where the temperature is lower.
For instance when the pan-am flight out of london, exploded over lockerbie in scotland last decade, many things like pieces of children's toys and clothes were scattered on the ground.

3. It is very likely than a non-USA citizen will carry their passport while in America. USA requires people to carry ID, and in the case of being a non-USA citizen you will carry your passport as a substitute for ID. For instance, all UK people I know in America will carry their passport since UK does not have an identity card.

4. A hole the shape of the planes wings was clearly visible in the building. I remember seeing this on at least 3 different FOREIGN news channels who reporting the incident live when it happened.
They also filmed the second impact live, which I saw.
These are film crews who are nothing to do with the USA government or media!

It seems your post is a silly conspiracy theory and you should know better!

"It seems your post is a silly conspiracy theory and you should know better!"

That's what is so disturbing - They don't!!

Strategist

You are too deluded for words.

NOT ALL EVIL STEMS FROM ISRAEL AND THE US.

Muslims carried out the 9/11 attacks.

Get used to it.

"Bilquis,
Keep dreaming Alice, you'll wake up in wonderland someday!"

The truth ain't nice but you know it cannot be changed. You Yanks/ Joos don't like your neat little 'scenarios' to be questioned but many in the world (and not all Muslims) do question them!

I care nothing for what you think. I was replying to a Muslim. I can't make the blind see; only the Beneficent and Almighty can do that.

Ciao.

If you had seen the video the French brothers shot that was on TV a couple of weeks ago, you would have seen thousands of papers flying out of the buildings. That's number 1.

Number two is this link to the Pentagon, a video that I hope still works. Take a look:

Flight 77 Mystery A Disinformation Campaign
Friday, 8 March 2002, 5:49 pm
Article: whatreallyhappened.com

03/07/02
THE CLAIM THAT THE PENTAGON WAS NOT STRUCK BY A PLANE IS DELIBERATE
DISINFORMATION
"Then, when the government hands out photos of the actual impact taken
by a security camera, the same media will work hard to dismiss all
critics of the government, indeed the internet community as a whole, as
not worthy of serious note. Intelligence agencies call the practice
"poisoning the well", and like staging fake terror attacks on ones own
people to start a war, such dirty tricks have been used by governments
for thousands of years."

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/image...28c1f14ff.jpeg
Image of Wreckage on Pentagon Lawn
From...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
As can be seen by the above, there are photos which show the wreckage of
the aircraft that struck the Pentagon. The claim that there was no plane
that hit the Pentagon was never credible. If the plane hadn't hit the
Pentagon, where had it gone? There were simply too many witnesses to the
plane for it not to exist.
One of the earliest clues that this was a deliberate operation by an
intelligence agency was the sheer volume of emails insisting that this
issue HAD to be looked at. Sometimes the spooks betray themselves with
their own heavy handedness.
So, why would anyone work so hard to try to establish such an obviously
phony straw man?
The truth is that the US Government's credibility within the nation and
around the world has hit an all time low. Traffic at this website has
quadrupled in just the last week alone, with about 50,000 accesses per
day of the main article page. The US Government has had a long history
of trying to trip up critics of the government with phony planted
stories, in order to discredit and embarrass them. Such certainly seems
to be the case now. Government operatives have been feeding this bogus
claim that there was no plane impact on the Pentagon all over the
internet, while the media tries to claim that this idea is the generally
accepted view of all government critics. Then, when the government hands
out photos of the actual impact taken by a security camera, the same
media will work hard to dismiss all critics of the government, indeed
the internet community as a whole, as not worthy of serious note.
Intelligence agencies call the practice "poisoning the well", and like
staging fake terror attacks on ones own people to start a war, such
dirty tricks have been used by governments for thousands of years. The
"umbrella gun" in the House Select Committee On Assassinations was a
similar operation. More recently, during open congressional hearings
into public concerns about government abuse, a plant was sent in,
dressed in camouflage fatigues, to scream about the secret government
tornado making machines. This planted operative became the focus of the
media's subsequent campaign to dismiss anyone who would be concerned
over government abuse as not worthy of notice.
Have no doubt; right now there is a war being waged for the minds of
America, and the internet is the high ground. The government always
plays dirty, because anyone who still plays fair will be at an automatic
disadvantage.
This story that the plane did not hit the Pentagon was obviously flawed,
primarily because it did not account for where the uncrashed plane went
off to. So, think about all the people who tried to sell you this lemon
(in my case, many of the return email addresses were fakes), and
recognize that they are either idiots or government stooges.
And note the timing of the phony story, appearing just at the right
moment to distract attention away from the Israeli spy scandal.
ENDS

Quote:

Originally posted by freedom_from_religion
Just a couple of points from a naive observer:

2. It is very likely artifacts like a passport will survive an explosion like this. The explosion will tend to rip large objects to pieces, but very quickly disperse them outside the fireball where the temperature is lower. For instance when the pan-am flight out of london, exploded over lockerbie in scotland last decade, many things like pieces of children's toys and clothes were scattered on the ground.

Lockerbie crash came about by an onboard explosion. A lot of things survived that crash, including plenty of debris of the plane itself. The WTC crash was a different ball game altogether. The explosion was caused by the fuel of the plane, when the plane itself was engulfed by the building it crashed into. That inferno left nothing of the plane or its contents intact. Let alone a selected passport belonging to an allaged Arabic hijacker!

Quote:

4. A hole the shape of the planes wings was clearly visible in the building. I remember seeing this on at least 3 different FOREIGN news channels who reporting the incident live when it happened.
They also filmed the second impact live, which I saw.
These are film crews who are nothing to do with the USA government or media!

Yes, I was talking about no wing impression being left on the Pentagon building facade. Not the WTC tower. We have all seen the footage of how the planes disappeared into the glass curtain walls of the WTC towers. One would imagine that atleast a wing profile would be indented into the concrete walls of the Pentagon, where the supposed plane crashed into it.

It doesn't add up.

**If you had seen the video the French brothers shot that was on TV a couple of weeks ago, you would have seen thousands of papers flying out of the buildings. That's number 1.** Jeanine

To compare papers flying out from other levels of the skyscraper when the building was collapsing due to structural failure, to an identity specific select passport eject out unscratched from the actual 3000 degree C inferno of the impact itself, speaks volumes of what it takes to con an American.

Obviously not much.

Re: That don't add up man!

He has got a point, how did the passports survive intact in the impact, whilst everything else was liquadted and smashed into smitherines

Hard to believe its possible.

Which then makes u wonder... whether it really was an inside job.

Re: That don't add up man!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arsalan

He has got a point, how did the passports survive intact in the impact, whilst everything else was liquadted and smashed into smitherines

Hard to believe its possible.

Don't you remember all the paperwork fluttering down before the towers collapsed?
Besides I recall Bin Laden saying that it was better than he expected, that he didn't expect the towers to collapse.

Re: That don't add up man!

Quote:

Originally Posted by tricky

Don't you remember all the paperwork fluttering down before the towers collapsed?
Besides I recall Bin Laden saying that it was better than he expected, that he didn't expect the towers to collapse.

That paper wasnt from the planes :rolleyes: - obviously.

1 it was from the shaken buildings
2 it was from the collapsed buildings

The other option is that .. human body are tragically obliterated, but 1000 of pieces of A4 paper are unscathed and float merily down to earth.
Thats just not believable, really isit

Re: That don't add up man!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arsalan

That paper wasnt from the planes :rolleyes: - obviously.

1 it was from the shaken buildings
2 it was from the collapsed buildings

The other option is that .. human body are tragically obliterated, but 1000 of pieces of A4 paper are unscathed and float merily down to earth.
Thats just not believable, really isit

yea, it is, one can't kill a piece of paper or a passport, can one?

Re: That don't add up man!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arsalan

That paper wasnt from the planes :rolleyes: - obviously.

1 it was from the shaken buildings
2 it was from the collapsed buildings

The other option is that .. human body are tragically obliterated, but 1000 of pieces of A4 paper are unscathed and float merily down to earth.
Thats just not believable, really isit

its quite believable...and it happened....:D