|
*RESOLUTION 91 (1951) CONCERNING THE INDIA-PAKISTAN
QUESTION SUBMITTED BY THE REPRESENTATIVES OF UNITED KINGDOM
AND UNITED STATES AND ADOPTED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL ON MARCH
30, 1951. (DOCUMENT NO. S/2017/REV. I, DATED THE 30TH
MARCH, 1951).
THE SECURITY COUNCIL,
Having received and noted
the report of Sir Owen Dixon, the United Nations Representative
for India and Pakistan on his mission initiated by the Security
Council resolution 80 (l9S0) of March 14, 1950.
Observing that the Governments
of India and Pakistan have accepted the provisions of the United
Nations Commission for India and Pakistan resolutions of 13 August,
1948, and 5 January, 1949, and have re-affirmed their desire that
the future of the State of Jammu and Kashmir shall be decided
through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite
conducted under the auspices of the United Nations,
Observing that on 27 October,
1950, the General Council of the "All Jammu and Kashmir National
Conference" adopted a resolution recommending the convening
of a Constituent Assembly for the purpose
of determining the "future shape and affiliations
of the State of Jammu and Kashmir"; observing further from
statements of responsible authorities that action is proposed
to convene such a Constituent Assembly and that the area from
which such a Constituent Assembly would be elected is only a part
of the whole territory of Jammu and Kashmir.
Reminding the Governments
and authorities concerned of the principle embodied in its resolutions
47 (1948) of 21 April 1948, 51 (1948) of 3 June 1948 and 80 (1950)
of 14 March 1950 and the United Nations Commission for India and
Pakistan resolutions of 13 August, 1948, and 5 January, 1949,
that the final disposition of the State of Jammu and Kashmir will
be made in accordance with the will of the people expressed through
the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite conducted
under the auspices of the United Nations,
Affirming that the convening
of a Constituent Assembly as recommended by the General Council
of the "All Jammu and Kashmir National Conference" and
any action that Assembly might attempt to take to determine the
future shape and affiliation of the entire State or any part thereof
would not constitute a disposition of the State in accordance
with the above principle,
Declaring its belief that
it is the duty of the Security Council in carrying out its primary
responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and
security to aid the parties to reach an amicable solution of the
Kashmir dispute and that a prompt settlement of this dispute is
of vital importance to the maintenance of international peace
and security,
Observing from Sir Owen
Dixon's report that the main points of difference preventing agreement
between the parties were:
*The Security Council voted on this Resolution on 30-3-1951 with the following result:- In favor: **Brazil, China, **Ecuador, France, **Netherlands. **Turkey, U.K., and U.S.A Against: None.
Abstaining: India, U.S.S.R. and Yugoslavia. **Non-Permanent Members of the Security Council. |
|||||||
|
This site is maintained by Gharib Hanif (hanif@gharib.demon.co.uk). Comments and suggestions always welcome. |
|||||||